Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database
A collection of relevant literature and case law
Showing all 1 results.
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Nebojsa Pavkovic (“Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.”)
- Year
- 2014
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Persecution on Sexual Grounds Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Superior Responsibility Physical Integrity Consent Foreseeable Consequence Common Objective of JCE Kosovo Albanian Civilians Kunarac
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Nebojsa Pavkovic
- Charges
- - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) for sexual assaults committed in Decani/Deçan and in Cirez/Qirez in the municipality of Srbica/Skenderaj by the VJ and MUP forces executing his orders. - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Pavkovic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Pavkovic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity
- sentencing
- Pavkovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Pavkovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE III persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Priština/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-05-87
This is free software. Created with LinkAhead
and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).